'By Using Corporate Social Responsibility (Csr) the Tobacco Industry\r'

'[pic] Assignment Cover sail 200336 communication channel Academic Skills School of personal credit line |James | | schoolchild last pay heed: | | | |Martin | |Student first name: | | | |17508979 | |Student number: | | | |200336 Business Academic Skills | |whole name and number: | | | |Thursday | | store day: | | | |3:30PM †5PM | | store prison term: | | | |EB. G. 7 | |Workshop room: | | | |Tyr iodin Kirchengast | |Workshop tutor: | | | |Essay | |Title of identification: | | | |1000 ledgers plus eferences | | aloofness: | | | |In Workshop Week 14 (beginning 28 whitethorn) | |Date ascribable: | | | |31/05/2012 | |Date submitted: | | | |Parramatta | |C international type Aereereus enrolment: | | Declaration: I hold a copy of this engagement if the original is lost or damaged. ? I hereby certify that zero(prenominal)graphic symbol of this assignment or product has been copied from all other student’s go bad or from each other etymon except where due ack nowledgement is do in the assignment. ? No part of the assignment/product has been written/produced for me by any other person except where collaborationism has been authorised by the subject proofreader/tutor concerned. ? I am assured that this work whitethorn be reproduced and submitted to buc burneering detection softwargon programs for the purpose of sight possible plagiarism (which whitethorn stay on a copy on its database for forthcoming plagiarism checking). I am cognisant that the plagiarism detection softw ar programs ar non the lone(prenominal) federal agency that willing be drug ab workoutd to detect plagiarism (i. e. having a zero report may still result in plagiarism). tactile sensation: ______________________________________ Note: An examiner or referee/tutor has the right to non speciate this assignment if the above promulgation has non been signed. ESSAY |Assessment interrogative |By using bodily brotherly trustyness (CSR) the baccy plant patience is seeking to channel their unhonorable state- inciteed | | | take c atomic number 18. Evaluate this dodging using three honorable dominions of the global Business Standards Codex. | Type your assay to a lower place:The baccy industry has make love below scrutiny regarding their subprogram of embodied righteousness to change an wrong image that has plagued them since the last mentioned half of the 20th century. The purpose of this analyse is to evaluate the enjoyment of corporate social tariff using three ethical principles of the global stock standards leaf-book and studies re get winding the baccy plant industry’s riding habit of corporate social righteousness in recounting to the health issues, environsal issues and the social issues concerning the baccy companies. The tobacco industry’s consumption of corporate responsibility to change their unethical popular image is unproductive and disingenuous, as they be simply using th is dodging as a defence against habitual disparagement.The farming and deed of tobacco carries widespread environmental impacts which be damaging to the skirt eco remainss and natural processes. British American tobacco and Phillip Morris had established tack on chains in the 1990s as a means of farming tobacco more efficiently aiming to maximise profits (Otanez & Glantz 2010). moreover these supply chains were damaging to the environment as well as topical anaesthetic communities of developing countries as deforestation and the implement of child labour on tobacco plantations became widespread throughout these supply chains. In the 2000s these companies addressed the environmental and labour concerns by redefining their tobacco farming procedures and implementing environmentally sustainable practices.Although it was revealed through the studies undertaken by Otanez & Glantz (2010) that the tobacco farming practices re primary(prenominal)ed the same and this atte mpt to lead off the normal was revealed to be a CSR exploit. The use of corporate social responsibility seeks to inform risks and adverse effects maximising stinting and social benefits establishing relationships found on swan to heighten progress in amity with ethical principles and moral values (Crisan, CM & Borza 2012). In damage of the Business Standards Codex, the tobacco industry violates the citizenship principle which states that â€Å" each employee should act as a responsible citizen in the community. ” (Stanwick & Stanwick 2009).The principle states that employees essential protect and preserve public goods or common grounds including sustainability and other environmental issues in cast to shoot work in an ethical manner. The tobacco industry’s attempt to appear ethical was transp atomic number 18nt as their business practices remained same(predicate) despite the illusion of addressing the issues. Furthermore the tobacco industry uses C SR to uphold the wellbeing of ordination despite continuing to produce fatal products. The health effects which occur as a result of using products manufacture by tobacco companies be widespread and in more or slight themes deadly. The tobacco companies be well aw be of their products deadly dis vex b bely they continue to manufacture and set apart these products.In an effort to repair their image, the tobacco companies utilise public relations exploits and funding jejuneness anti-smoking campaigns which entertain been proven to be ineffective and in fact a flagitious marketing son of a bitch directed at underage green goddessrs. (Friedman 2009) baccy companies expect unconstipated gone as far to revolve approximately their corporate social responsibility tactical manoeuvre at the education sector in the form of scholarships, grants, professorships and even the creation of an wide school ( conception Health Organisation 2003). This use of corporate social res ponsibility however was used as more of a defence against public condemnation due to the unchanged disposition of their selling practices.On marvelous 17, 2006 the United States District Court plant the tobacco industry guilty of a number of allegations of fraud and conspiracy (Friedman 2009). The stockpile of the tobacco companies in light of this case was highly unethical in terms of the global business standards codex in particular the dignity principle which states â€Å"protect the dignity of people in gild includes ensuring the human rights of health, safety and privacy” (Stanwick & Stanwick 2009). Tobacco companies continue to manufacture and consider products with full knowledge of the products lethal nature when used as directed, using CSR only as a defence against public scrutiny.Clement-Jones (2004) states that no company producing weapons or increment tobacco can ever be rightfully socially responsible due to the offensive effects of their products i ndicating that corporate social responsibility can merely be used as a gibe of deception and hypocrisy. The tobacco industry’s use of CSR is non only a publicity exploit precisely a means of self regulation to annul further government statute law on business and manufacturing practices. By implementing CSR practices into the business conduct of tobacco industry, the companies create a dishonorable representation of responsibility for their actions. This however has come under scrutiny from NGO’s as calls for â€Å"international regulation approve up by national legislation to ensure the enforcement of real social responsibility on the corporate world” (Hirschhorn 2003).Tobacco companies have been more of the first organisations in the archaean years of the 1900s to realise the value of public relations and gaining hold back for their industry (Thomson 1998). The tobacco industry’s use of CSR is vigour more than companies protecting their profi ts and whole their shargonholders. Hastings & Liberman (2009) state that CSR is some(a) other means of promotion and sponsorship for the tobacco companies, by conducting â€Å"socially responsible causes” tobacco companies are able to inadvertently sponsor these causes and promote their products giving further deduction that the tobacco companies have ulterior motives to their use of CSR.The transparency principle of the global business standards codex states that employees are not to ensure in a deceptive manner and that business should be conducted openly and honestly (Stanwick & Stanwick 2009). The tobacco industry fails to derive this principle through their use of CSR as they operate in a deceptive manner. CSR can however be an effective in any casel for improving an organisations reputation and ethical image such is the case of Alcoa, an Australian based aluminium manufacturing company which improved its rest in the community with effective CSR practices (Black, Sydney-Smith & Zhao 2009). The use of CSR by organisations such as tobacco companies can never truly be an effective strategy as long as the manufacture of harmful products continues under these organisations.Using three principles of the business standards codex as well as the use of CSR by the tobacco industry to check public maintain, it has been sh deliver that these strategies have ulterior motives and are purely marketing tools used by these companies to conceal the promotion of their products which is banned by legislation. CSR however can remain a highly effective tool for public relations as long as the intentions of those organisations are beneficial to society. graphemes Type your university extension list in alphabetical ready below: Black, LD, Sydney-Smith, K & Zhao, Y 2009, How Business Behaviour Contri furtheres to Reputation and Perceptions of capital punishment: A Case Study of Alcoa of Australia, viewed April 2012, .Clement-Jones, T 2004 â₠¬ËœCoporate social responsibility †bottom-line issue or public relations exercise? ’ in J Hancock (ed), Investing in corporate social responsibility: a guide to best practice, business plan & the UKs leading companies, 1st edn, Kogan rascal Limited. , London, United Kingdom. Crisan, CM & Borza, A 2012, ‘ affectionate Entrepreneurship and Corporate Social Responsibilities’ external Business Research, 2 February, viewed 4 April 2012, http://search. proquest. com. ezproxy. uws. edu. au/docview/963357717/fulltextPDF? accountid=36155;. Friedman, L 2009, ‘Tobacco industry use of corporate social responsibility simulated military operation as a sword and guard on second hand smoke issues’, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 19-827 viewed 11 April 2012, University of westward Sydney Database, DOI: 10. 1111/j. 1748-720X. 2009. 00453. x Hirschhorn, N 2004, ‘Corporate social responsibility and the tobacco industry: hope or nag? ’, Tobacco Control, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 445-453, viewed 7 May 2012, University of horse opera Sydney Library database, DOI 10. 1136/tc. 2003. 006676 Hastings, G, Liberman, J 2009 ‘Tobacco corporate social responsibility and fairy godmothers: the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control slays a young myth’, Tobacco Control, vol 18 no. 2 pp 73-74, viewed 9 May 2012, University of Western Sydney Library database, DOI 10. 1136/tc. 2008. 029264 Otanez, M, Glantz, G 2011 ‘Social responsibility in tobacco production?Tobacco companies’ use of green supply chains to obscure the real be of tobacco farming’, Tobacco Control, vol 20 no. 6, pp403-411, viewed 5 May 2012, University of Western Sydney Library database, DOI 10. 1136/tc. 2010. 039537 Stanwick, P & Stanwick S 2009, ‘The foundation of ethical purpose’ , in Campbell, N (ed. ) , Business schoolmanian skills, 4th edn, Pearson Australia, Frenchs Forest, NSW Thomson , S. R. 1998, Public Relations and the Tobacco Industry: Examining the Debate on practitioner Ethics, Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 152-164, viewed 3 April 2012, UWS Library database, DOI 10. 207/s15327728jmme1303_2 World Health Organiation 2003, Tobacco industry and corporate responsibility… an inherent contradiction view 3 April 2012, . |ESSAY /100 | | | get through Fail |Needs Work | force |Credit | line |High Distinction | |STRUCTURE | |Introduction |thither is no accession. The introduction: |The introduction: |The introduction: |The introduction: |The introduction: | | | |Has no clear dissertation financial description OR|Has a dissertation educational activity and |Has a dissertation teaching |Has a clear thesis statement |Has a clear thesis statement that | | | |The thesis statement is not |Outlines the main points that |Outlines the main points that |that relates back to the |relates back to the fount ainhead | | | |related to the quiz question | pay your position but may or|support your position but may or|question |Outlines the main points that | | | |and |may not be in the typeset order. may not be in the correct order |Outlines the main points that |support your position in the correct| | | |Does not synopsis the main points| |and |support your position in the |order and | | | |that support your position. | |Has a few general statements |correct order and |Has a few general statements about | | | | | |related to the topic. Has a few general statements |the topic that clarifies your | | | | | | |about the topic. |interpretation of the question. | |/10 | | | | | | | | |0 |0. 5-4. 5 |5. 0-6. 0 |6. 5-7. 0 |7. 5-8. 0 |8. -10 | | |The arguments are not applicable |The arguments are somewhat |The arguments are germane(predicate) to |The arguments are closelyly |The arguments are pertinent to |The arguments are highly relevant to| |Arguments, anatomical structure and |to the attempt question and do not|relevant to the study question |the essay question but may not |relevant to the essay question |the essay question and mostly |the essay question and support the | |Cohesion |support the thesis statement or |but do not support the thesis |support the thesis statement |and somewhat support the thesis |support the thesis statement |thesis statement | | |The carve ups are not well statement and |Some paragraphs are coordinate |statement |Each paragraph is merged |Each paragraph is structured well | | |structured and |The paragraphs are not well |well but may or may not have a |Each paragraph is usually |well with one topic and |with one topic and conclude | | |The sequence does not relate the |structured and |single topic. |structured well with one topic | concluding sentence. |sentence which links back to the | | | delimit in the introduction. |The sequence does not match the |Some paragraphs are linked and |and concluding sentence. | well-nigh parag raphs and ideas are |thesis statement. | | | |outline in the introduction. The sequence may or may not | bordering paragraphs are clearly |clearly linked and | tout ensemble paragraphs and ideas are | | | | |match the outline in the |linked and |The sequence matches the outline|in effect linked and | | | | |introduction. |The sequence matches the outline|in the introduction. |The sequence matches the outline in | | | | | |in the introduction. | |the introduction. |/25 | | | | | | | | |0-7. 0 |7. 5-12. 0 |12. 5-16. 0 |16. 5-18. 5 |19. 0-21. 0 |21. 5-25 | | utilise of differentiate | there is no supporting severalise |The evidence that is presented: |The evidence that is presented: |The evidence that is presented: |The evidence that is presented: |The evidence that is presented: | | |for the arguments presented. |Does not incorporate at least(prenominal) 3 |Incorporates at least 3 of the |Incorporates at least 3 of the Incorporates at least 3 of the |Incorporates at least 3 of the | | | |of the needed readings |required readings |required readings |required readings |required readings | | | |Is circumscribed and |Supports the arguments but |Supports the arguments |Supports the arguments |Supports the arguments from a number| | | |Is a descriptive summary. |Is a descriptive summary. |Elaborates on its relevance and |Elaborates on its relevance and |of perspectives | | | | | |Uses descriptive ethics. |Uses descriptive and analytical |Evaluates relevance and | | | | | | |ethics. Uses descriptive, analytical and | | | | | | | |normative ethics. | |/20 | | | | | | | | |0-5. 5 |6. 0-9. 5 |10. 0-12. 5 |13. 0-14. 5 |15. 0-16. 5 |17. 0-20 | | | there is no closing. The conclusion: |The conclusion: |The conclusion: |The conclusion: |The conclusion: | |Conclusion | |Summarises some of the |Summarises some of the |Summarises some of the main |Summarises most of the main |Summarises all the main arguments in| | | |information presented in the |information presented in the |arguments in the be of the |arguments in the torso of the |the dust of the essay; | | | | remains but |body and |essay and |essay and |Restates the thesis statement and | | | |Does not restate the thesis |Restates the thesis statement. |Restates the thesis statement. |Restates the thesis statement. Makes a final comment without | | | |statement. | | | |introducing new ideas. | |/10 | | | | | | | | |0 |. 5-4. 5 |5. 0-6. 0 |6. 5-7. 0 |7. 5-8. 0 |8. -10 | |Academic writing dah |Does not use: |Does not use: |May or may not use: |Sometimes uses: |Mostly uses: | eer uses: | | |Objective and native |Objective and inseparable |Objective and indispensable |Objective and subjective |Objective and subjective |Objective and subjective talking to | | | run-in fittingly |language appropriately |language appropriately |language appropriately |language appropriately |appropriately | | |Connections amid ideas and |Connections surrounded by ideas and |Connections between ideas and | go along and consistent connections | apothegmatic and formal ideas |Concise and formal ideas | | |sentences AND |sentences or |sentences and/or |between ideas and sentences |Clear and logical connections |Clear and logical connections | | |Formal academic writing. |Formal academic writing. |Formal academic writing. |and/or |between ideas and sentences |between ideas and sentences and | | | | | |Formal academic writing. |and/or |Formal academic writing. | | | | | |Formal academic writing. | | |/5 | | | | | | | | |0-1. 0 |1. 5-2. 0 |2. 5-3. 0 |3. 5 |4. 0 |4. 5-5. 0 | REFERENCING | |In-text reference |Few or no resources are |Some resources are adjudge |Most resources are admit |Most resources are acknowledged |All resources are acknowledged but|All resources are acknowledged | | |acknowledged OR |May or may not follow the Harvard |but |Accurately follow the Harvard |Do not accurately follow the |Accurately follow the Harvard | | |Do not follow the Harvard governance |system OR |D o not accurately follow the |system and |Harvard system and |system and | | |OR |Uses too many direct quotes. |Harvard system and |May or may not use too many direct|Quotes minimally and |Uses own words. | | |Uses direct quotes excessively. | |May or may not use too many direct|quotes. |appropriately. | | | | |quotes. | | | | |/10 | | | | | | | | |0-2. 5 |3. 0-4. 5 |5. 0-6. 0 |6. 5-7. 0 |7. 5-8. 0 |8. -10 | |Reference list | on that point are less than 6 scholarly | on that point are less than 6 scholarly |There are at least 6 scholarly |There are at least 7-9 scholarly |There are 10 scholarly references |There are 10 scholarly references | | |references and |references OR |references |references |Most references are cited in the |All references are cited in the | | |Most references are not in the |Most references are not in the |Most references are cited in the |Most references are cited in the |body of the essay and/or |body of the essay and | | |body of the essay or |body of the essay and |body of the essay and |body of the essay and/or |The Harvard style is near perfect. The Harvard style is perfect. | | |It is not in Harvard style. |It is not in Harvard style. |It is in Harvard style. |The Harvard style is good. | | | |/10 | | | | | | | | |0-2. 5 |3. 0-4. 5 |5. 0-6. 0 |6. 5-7. 0 |7. 5-8. 0 |8. -10 | |GRAMMAR AND PRESENTATION | |Spelling, grammar &|There are major grammatic errors|There are a lot of spelling, |There are some spelling, |There are a few spelling, |There are minor spelling, |There are no spelling, grammatical| |punctuation |which make the essay difficult to |grammatical and punctuation |grammatical and punctuation |grammatical and punctuation |grammatical and punctuation |and punctuation errors. | | |comprehend. |errors. |errors. |errors. |errors. | | |/5 | | | | | | | | |0-1. 0 |1. 5-2. 0 |2. 5-3. 0 |3. 5 |4. 0 |4. 5-5. | |Presentation |Does not: |Does not: |Uses discernment template |Uses sound judgement template |Uses sound judgeme nt template |Uses assessment template | | |Use assessment template |Use assessment template OR |Fills in some of the coversheet |Fills in some of the coversheet |Fills in most of the coversheet |Fills in all of the coversheet | | |Sign promulgation on coversheet AND|Fill in the coversheet OR | right |correctly |correctly |correctly | | |Adhere to word limit. Sign proclamation OR |Signs declaration and |Ticks the boxes and signs |Ticks the boxes and signs |Ticks the boxes and signs | | | |Adhere to word limit. |Adheres to word limit. |declaration and |declaration and |declaration and | | | | | |Adheres to word limit. |Adheres to word limit. |Adheres to word limit. | |/5 | | | | | | | | |0 |0. 5-2. |2. 5-3. 0 |3. 5 |4. 0 |4. 5-5. 0 | additional comments: |Sub-Total |Number of eld Late |Late Penalties |Total | |(100) | |(minus 10 marks/day) |(100) | | | | | | | | | | |\r\n'